我正在尝试使用类级别的自定义注释实现跨域验证 (JSR-303)。但是,不会调用 isValid 方法(但会调用 initialize 方法)。
所以我的问题是:为什么没有为此类级别的 validator 调用 isValid 方法?在属性级别定义它是可行的!
我在 JBoss AS 7 和 Websphere AS 8 上试过了。
这是代码和 JUnit 测试(有效)
测试.java
public class Test {
@org.junit.Test
public void test() throws ParseException {
Person person = new Person();
SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyyMMDD");
person.setPartyClosingDateFrom(new Date());
person.setPartyClosingDateTo(sdf.parse("20120210"));
Set<ConstraintViolation<Person>> violations = Validation.buildDefaultValidatorFactory().getValidator().validate(person);
for(ConstraintViolation<Person> violation : violations) {
System.out.println("Message:- " + violation.getMessage());
}
}
}
DateCompare.java
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.TYPE;
import static java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME;
import java.lang.annotation.Documented;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;
import javax.validation.Constraint;
import javax.validation.Payload;
@Target({ TYPE})
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@Constraint(validatedBy = DateCompareValidator.class)
@Documented
public @interface DateCompare {
/** First date. */
String firstDate();
/** Second date. */
String secondDate();
Class<?>[] constraints() default {};
Class<?>[] groups() default {};
Class<? extends Payload>[] payload() default {};
String message() default "totally wrong, dude!";
DateValidator.DateComparisonMode matchMode() default
DateValidator.DateComparisonMode.EQUAL;
}
DateCompareValidator.java
public class DateCompareValidator implements ConstraintValidator<DateCompare, Object> {
/** describes the mode the validator should use**/
private DateValidator.DateComparisonMode comparisonMode;
/** The first date field name. */
private String firstDateFieldName;
/** The second date field name. */
private String secondDateFieldName;
/** the message to be used **/
private String messageKey = "failure";
/**
* Initialize.
*
* This method is used to set the parameters ans is REQUIRED even if you don't use any parameters
*
* @param constraintAnnotation the constraint annotation
*/
@Override
public void initialize(final DateCompare constraintAnnotation) {
this.comparisonMode = constraintAnnotation.matchMode();
this.firstDateFieldName = constraintAnnotation.firstDate();
this.secondDateFieldName = constraintAnnotation.secondDate();
}
/**
* Checks if it is valid.
*
* @param target the target
* @param context the context
* @return true, if is valid
*/
@Override
public boolean isValid(final Object target, final ConstraintValidatorContext context) {
boolean isValid = true;
final Date valueDate1 = DateCompareValidator.getPropertyValue(Date.class, this.firstDateFieldName, target);
final Date valueDate2 = DateCompareValidator.getPropertyValue(Date.class, this.secondDateFieldName, target);
if (isValid) {
isValid = DateValidator.isValid(valueDate1, valueDate2, this.comparisonMode);
} else {
// at this point comparisonMode does not fit tp the result and we have to
// design an error Message
final ResourceBundle messageBundle = ResourceBundle.getBundle("resources.messages");
final MessageFormat message = new MessageFormat(messageBundle.getString(this.messageKey));
final Object[] messageArguments = { messageBundle.getString(this.messageKey + "." + this.comparisonMode) };
// replace the default-message with the one we just created
context.disableDefaultConstraintViolation();
context.buildConstraintViolationWithTemplate(message.format(messageArguments)).addConstraintViolation();
isValid = false;
}
return isValid;
}
public static <T> T getPropertyValue(final Class<T> requiredType, final String propertyName, final Object instance) {
if (requiredType == null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid argument. requiredType must NOT be null!");
}
if (propertyName == null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid argument. PropertyName must NOT be null!");
}
if (instance == null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid argument. Object instance must NOT be null!");
}
T returnValue = null;
try {
final PropertyDescriptor descriptor = new PropertyDescriptor(propertyName, instance.getClass());
final Method readMethod = descriptor.getReadMethod();
if (readMethod == null) {
throw new IllegalStateException("Property '" + propertyName + "' of " + instance.getClass().getName()
+ " is NOT readable!");
}
if (requiredType.isAssignableFrom(readMethod.getReturnType())) {
try {
final Object propertyValue = readMethod.invoke(instance);
returnValue = requiredType.cast(propertyValue);
} catch (final Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace(); // unable to invoke readMethod
}
}
} catch (final IntrospectionException e) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Property '" + propertyName + "' is NOT defined in "
+ instance.getClass().getName() + "!", e);
}
return returnValue;
}
DateValidator.java
public class DateValidator {
/**
* The Enum DateComparisonMode.
*
* Determins which Type of validation is used
*/
public enum DateComparisonMode {
/** the given Date must be BEFORE the referenced Date */
BEFORE,
/** the given Date must be BEFORE_OR_EQUAL the referenced Date */
BEFORE_OR_EQUAL,
/** the given Date must be EQUAL the referenced Date */
EQUAL,
/** the given Date must be AFTER_OR_EQUAL the referenced Date */
AFTER_OR_EQUAL,
/** the given Date must be AFTER the referenced Date */
AFTER;
}
/**
* Compare 2 Date Values based on a given Comparison Mode.
*
* @param baseDate the base date
* @param valuationDate the valuation date
* @param comparisonMode the comparison mode
* @return true, if is valid
*/
public static boolean isValid(final Date baseDate, final Date valuationDate, final DateComparisonMode comparisonMode) {
// Timevalue of both dates will be set to 00:00:0000
final Date compValuationDate = DateValidator.convertDate(valuationDate);
final Date compBaseDate = DateValidator.convertDate(baseDate);
// compare the values
final int result = compValuationDate.compareTo(compBaseDate);
// match the result to the comparisonMode and return true
// if rule is fulfilled
switch (result) {
case -1:
if (comparisonMode == DateComparisonMode.BEFORE) {
return true;
}
if (comparisonMode == DateComparisonMode.BEFORE_OR_EQUAL) {
return true;
}
break;
case 0:
if (comparisonMode == DateComparisonMode.BEFORE_OR_EQUAL) {
return true;
}
if (comparisonMode == DateComparisonMode.EQUAL) {
return true;
}
if (comparisonMode == DateComparisonMode.AFTER_OR_EQUAL) {
return true;
}
break;
case 1:
if (comparisonMode == DateComparisonMode.AFTER) {
return true;
}
if (comparisonMode == DateComparisonMode.AFTER_OR_EQUAL) {
return true;
}
break;
default:
return false; // should not happen....
}
return false;
}
/**
* Convert date.
*
* sets the time Value of a given Date filed to 00:00:0000
*
* @param t the t
* @return the date
*/
private static Date convertDate(final Date t) {
final Calendar calendar = Calendar.getInstance();
calendar.setTime(t);
calendar.set(Calendar.HOUR_OF_DAY, 0);
calendar.set(Calendar.MINUTE, 0);
calendar.set(Calendar.SECOND, 0);
calendar.set(Calendar.MILLISECOND, 0);
return (calendar.getTime());
}
特别是属性检索取自这篇文章 question
最佳答案
JSF 2.0 不调用类级别的验证约束。 来自 JSF validation :
JSF 2 provides built-in integration with JSR-303 constraints. When you are using bean validation in your application, JSF automatically uses the constraints for beans that are referenced by
UIInputvalues.
你必须手动调用它,或者你可以尝试Seam Faces其扩展名为 <f:validateBean>
关于java - 未调用 Crossfield 验证的自定义类级别约束,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9212777/
我有一个Ruby程序,它使用rubyzip压缩XML文件的目录树。gem。我的问题是文件开始变得很重,我想提高压缩级别,因为压缩时间不是问题。我在rubyzipdocumentation中找不到一种为创建的ZIP文件指定压缩级别的方法。有人知道如何更改此设置吗?是否有另一个允许指定压缩级别的Ruby库? 最佳答案 这是我通过查看rubyzip内部创建的代码。level=Zlib::BEST_COMPRESSIONZip::ZipOutputStream.open(zip_file)do|zip|Dir.glob("**/*")d
我正在尝试设置一个puppet节点,但rubygems似乎不正常。如果我通过它自己的二进制文件(/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/facter-1.5.8/bin/facter)在cli上运行facter,它工作正常,但如果我通过由rubygems(/usr/bin/facter)安装的二进制文件,它抛出:/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/facter/uptime.rb:11:undefinedmethod`get_uptime'forFacter::Util::Uptime:Module(NoMethodError)from/usr/lib/ruby
给定这段代码defcreate@upgrades=User.update_all(["role=?","upgraded"],:id=>params[:upgrade])redirect_toadmin_upgrades_path,:notice=>"Successfullyupgradeduser."end我如何在该操作中实际验证它们是否已保存或未重定向到适当的页面和消息? 最佳答案 在Rails3中,update_all不返回任何有意义的信息,除了已更新的记录数(这可能取决于您的DBMS是否返回该信息)。http://ar.ru
我想安装一个带有一些身份验证的私有(private)Rubygem服务器。我希望能够使用公共(public)Ubuntu服务器托管内部gem。我读到了http://docs.rubygems.org/read/chapter/18.但是那个没有身份验证-如我所见。然后我读到了https://github.com/cwninja/geminabox.但是当我使用基本身份验证(他们在他们的Wiki中有)时,它会提示从我的服务器获取源。所以。如何制作带有身份验证的私有(private)Rubygem服务器?这是不可能的吗?谢谢。编辑:Geminabox问题。我尝试“捆绑”以安装新的gem..
我希望我的UserPrice模型的属性在它们为空或不验证数值时默认为0。这些属性是tax_rate、shipping_cost和price。classCreateUserPrices8,:scale=>2t.decimal:tax_rate,:precision=>8,:scale=>2t.decimal:shipping_cost,:precision=>8,:scale=>2endendend起初,我将所有3列的:default=>0放在表格中,但我不想要这样,因为它已经填充了字段,我想使用占位符。这是我的UserPrice模型:classUserPrice回答before_val
我在我的项目中添加了一个系统来重置用户密码并通过电子邮件将密码发送给他,以防他忘记密码。昨天它运行良好(当我实现它时)。当我今天尝试启动服务器时,出现以下错误。=>BootingWEBrick=>Rails3.2.1applicationstartingindevelopmentonhttp://0.0.0.0:3000=>Callwith-dtodetach=>Ctrl-CtoshutdownserverExiting/Users/vinayshenoy/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p0/gems/actionmailer-3.2.1/lib/action_mailer
我有一个表单,其中有很多字段取自数组(而不是模型或对象)。我如何验证这些字段的存在?solve_problem_pathdo|f|%>... 最佳答案 创建一个简单的类来包装请求参数并使用ActiveModel::Validations。#definedsomewhere,atthesimplest:require'ostruct'classSolvetrue#youcouldevencheckthesolutionwithavalidatorvalidatedoerrors.add(:base,"WRONG!!!")unlesss
我想向我的Controller传递一个参数,它是一个简单的复选框,但我不知道如何在模型的form_for中引入它,这是我的观点:{:id=>'go_finance'}do|f|%>Transferirde:para:Entrada:"input",:placeholder=>"Quantofoiganho?"%>Saída:"output",:placeholder=>"Quantofoigasto?"%>Nota:我想做一个额外的复选框,但我该怎么做,模型中没有一个对象,而是一个要检查的对象,以便在Controller中创建一个ifelse,如果没有检查,请帮助我,非常感谢,谢谢
我已经从我的命令行中获得了一切,所以我可以运行rubymyfile并且它可以正常工作。但是当我尝试从sublime中运行它时,我得到了undefinedmethod`require_relative'formain:Object有人知道我的sublime设置中缺少什么吗?我正在使用OSX并安装了rvm。 最佳答案 或者,您可以只使用“require”,它应该可以正常工作。我认为“require_relative”仅适用于ruby1.9+ 关于ruby-主要:Objectwhenrun
我真的很习惯使用Ruby编写以下代码:my_hash={}my_hash['test']=1Java中对应的数据结构是什么? 最佳答案 HashMapmap=newHashMap();map.put("test",1);我假设? 关于java-等价于Java中的RubyHash,我们在StackOverflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22737685/