我正在处理与 SOAP 服务的接口(interface)，该服务似乎不处理默认 namespace ，但可以很好地处理在 SOAP 信封级别声明的全局 namespace 和 namespace 前缀。

问题是 WCF 不会在根目录下创建这些全局命名空间，而是使用显式的无前缀默认命名空间，而服务显然会阻塞这些默认命名空间。现在我知道这并不是 WCF 的错——我相信 WCF 生成的消息是有效的 XML，但服务仍然会阻塞它。

使用 WCF 生成的输出如下所示:

<s:Envelope xmlns:s="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
  <s:Header>
    <h:Security xmlns:h="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-
          ...
    </h:Security>
  </s:Header>
  <s:Body xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
    <cancelShipmentRequest xmlns="http://www.royalmailgroup.com/api/ship/V2">
      <integrationHeader>
        <dateTime xmlns="http://www.royalmailgroup.com/integration/core/V1">2016-03-26T01:44:37.0493801Z</dateTime>
        <version xmlns="http://www.royalmailgroup.com/integration/core/V1">2</version>
        <identification xmlns="http://www.royalmailgroup.com/integration/core/V1">
          <applicationId>RMG-API-G-01</applicationId>
          <transactionId>ozhckwej6sxg</transactionId>
        </identification>
      </integrationHeader>
      <cancelShipments>
        <shipmentNumber>TTT001908905GB</shipmentNumber>
      </cancelShipments>
    </cancelShipmentRequest>
  </s:Body>
</s:Envelope>

这是行不通的。

使用以下 SOAP 信封(在 SoapUI 中手动)确实有效:

<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
  xmlns:oas="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd"
  xmlns:v2="http://www.royalmailgroup.com/api/ship/V2"
  xmlns:v1="http://www.royalmailgroup.com/integration/core/V1">
  <soapenv:Header>
    <h:Security xmlns:h="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd" xmlns="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
       ...
    </h:Security>
  </soapenv:Header>
  <soapenv:Body>
    <v2:cancelShipmentRequest>
      <v2:integrationHeader>
        <v1:dateTime>2016-03-02T14:55:00Z</v1:dateTime>
        <v1:version>2</v1:version>
        <v1:identification>
          <v1:applicationId>RMG-API-G-01</v1:applicationId>
          <v1:transactionId>wftdaife96gv</v1:transactionId>
        </v1:identification>
      </v2:integrationHeader>
      <v2:cancelShipments>
        <v2:shipmentNumber>TTT001908905GB</v2:shipmentNumber>
      </v2:cancelShipments>
    </v2:cancelShipmentRequest>
  </soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>

两者的区别在于 v1 和 v2 命名空间是在文档顶部全局声明的，而第二个文档中没有局部命名空间声明。

也许我遗漏了什么，但对我来说，WCF 生成的 XML 看起来是有效的，并且在命名空间方面代表相同的文档状态。

我能说的唯一区别是命名空间的声明方式。尽管 WCF 版本似乎有效并生成相同的命名空间，但服务会提示命名空间引用无效。

Failed Schema Validation: Message failed schema validation: Schemas validity error : Element 'xmlns': This element is not expected. Expected is ( {http://www.royalmailgroup.com/api/ship/V2}integrationHeader ).

问题是，强制 WCF 在顶部而不是内联添加命名空间引用的最佳方法是什么？到目前为止，我发现的唯一方法是使用消息检查器并显式重写消息，但如果我完成所有这些，我还不如手动创建消息。

我有什么想法可以尝试强制 WCF 使用显式 namespace 前缀而无需手动重写消息？

最佳答案

所以这个问题的答案是创建一个自定义的 IClientMessageFormatter 和 Message 然后覆盖 Message.OnWriteStartEnvelope() 以显式写出Soap 文档根目录下的所有命名空间。呈现的文档然后重用这些命名空间，而不是在子元素上显式分配命名空间。

为此需要创建 3 个类:

• 处理实际 OnWriteStartEnvelope()
的消息实现
• 挂接到 WCF 的 IClientMessageFormatter
• FormatMessageAttribute 附加到客户端的每个方法

这是所有三个的代码:

public class RoyalMailCustomMessage : Message
{
    private readonly Message message;

    public RoyalMailCustomMessage(Message message)
    {
        this.message = message;
    }
    public override MessageHeaders Headers
    {
        get { return this.message.Headers; }
    }
    public override MessageProperties Properties
    {
        get { return this.message.Properties; }
    }
    public override MessageVersion Version
    {
        get { return this.message.Version; }
    }

    protected override void OnWriteStartBody(XmlDictionaryWriter writer)
    {
        writer.WriteStartElement("Body", "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/");
    }
    protected override void OnWriteBodyContents(XmlDictionaryWriter writer)
    {
        this.message.WriteBodyContents(writer);
    }
    protected override void OnWriteStartEnvelope(XmlDictionaryWriter writer)
    {
        writer.WriteStartElement("soapenv", "Envelope", "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/");
        writer.WriteAttributeString("xmlns", "oas", null, "http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd");
        writer.WriteAttributeString("xmlns", "v2", null, "http://www.royalmailgroup.com/api/ship/V2");
        writer.WriteAttributeString("xmlns", "v1", null, "http://www.royalmailgroup.com/integration/core/V1");
        writer.WriteAttributeString("xmlns", "xsi", null, "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance");
        writer.WriteAttributeString("xmlns", "xsd", null, "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema");            
    }
}

public class RoyalMailMessageFormatter : IClientMessageFormatter
{
    private readonly IClientMessageFormatter formatter;

    public RoyalMailMessageFormatter(IClientMessageFormatter formatter)
    {
        this.formatter = formatter;
    }

    public Message SerializeRequest(MessageVersion messageVersion, object[] parameters)
    {
        var message = this.formatter.SerializeRequest(messageVersion, parameters);
        return new RoyalMailCustomMessage(message);
    }

    public object DeserializeReply(Message message, object[] parameters)
    {
        return this.formatter.DeserializeReply(message, parameters);
    }
}


[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Method)]
public class RoyalMailFormatMessageAttribute : Attribute, IOperationBehavior
{
    public void AddBindingParameters(OperationDescription operationDescription,
        BindingParameterCollection bindingParameters)
    { }

    public void ApplyClientBehavior(OperationDescription operationDescription, ClientOperation clientOperation)
    {
        var serializerBehavior = operationDescription.Behaviors.Find<XmlSerializerOperationBehavior>();

        if (clientOperation.Formatter == null)
            ((IOperationBehavior)serializerBehavior).ApplyClientBehavior(operationDescription, clientOperation);

        IClientMessageFormatter innerClientFormatter = clientOperation.Formatter;
        clientOperation.Formatter = new RoyalMailMessageFormatter(innerClientFormatter);
    }

    public void ApplyDispatchBehavior(OperationDescription operationDescription, DispatchOperation dispatchOperation)
    { }

    public void Validate(OperationDescription operationDescription) { }
}

其中大部分是仪式和样板代码。关键代码片段是连接实际命名空间的 OnWriteStartEnvelope、格式化程序连接到 WCF 管道的 SerializeRequest 和消息的 ApplyClientBehavior formatter是附在实际操作上的。

为了连接起来，我将属性添加到服务接口(interface)上的客户端方法 - 在本例中是在 Reference.cs 中生成的 WCF 客户端中。

    // CODEGEN: Generating message contract since the operation cancelShipment is neither RPC nor document wrapped.
    [System.ServiceModel.OperationContractAttribute(Action="cancelShipment", ReplyAction="*")]
    [System.ServiceModel.FaultContractAttribute(typeof(MarvelPress.Workflow.Business.RoyalShippingApi.exceptionDetails), Action="cancelShipment", Name="exceptionDetails")]
    [System.ServiceModel.XmlSerializerFormatAttribute(SupportFaults=true)]
    [System.ServiceModel.ServiceKnownTypeAttribute(typeof(contactMechanism))]
    [System.ServiceModel.ServiceKnownTypeAttribute(typeof(baseRequest))]
    [RoyalMailFormatMessage()]
    MarvelPress.Workflow.Business.RoyalShippingApi.cancelShipmentResponse1 cancelShipment(MarvelPress.Workflow.Business.RoyalShippingApi.cancelShipmentRequest1 request);

从 WCF 生成的消息现在看起来与预期的一样，所有命名空间都在文档顶部定义:

<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:oas="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd" xmlns:v2="http://www.royalmailgroup.com/api/ship/V2" xmlns:v1="http://www.royalmailgroup.com/integration/core/V1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
  <s:Header xmlns:s="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
    <h:Security>...</h:Security>
  </s:Header>
  <soapenv:Body>
    <v2:cancelShipmentRequest>
      <v2:integrationHeader>
        <v1:dateTime>2016-04-02T01:04:50.4122473Z</v1:dateTime>
        <v1:version>2</v1:version>
        <v1:identification>
          <v1:applicationId>RMG-API-G-01</v1:applicationId>
          <v1:transactionId>fshrxevdnc7n</v1:transactionId>
        </v1:identification>
      </v2:integrationHeader>
      <v2:cancelShipments>
        <v2:shipmentNumber>TTT001908905GB</v2:shipmentNumber>
      </v2:cancelShipments>
    </v2:cancelShipmentRequest>
  </soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>    

有关更多信息和添加格式化程序的通用命名空间，请在此处查看我的相关博客文章:http://weblog.west-wind.com/posts/2016/Apr/02/Custom-Message-Formatting-in-WCF-to-add-all-Namespaces-to-the-SOAP-Envelope

关于c# - WCF 客户端 : Forcing Global Namespaces，我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36230835/