搜索了很多关于 phantom reference 的内容,但找不到它的实际用法。逻辑上 get() 方法在 Phantom References 的情况下返回 null
最佳答案
可以关注这个blog :
What good are PhantomReferences? I'm only aware of two serious cases for them: first, they allow you to determine exactly when an object was removed from memory. They are in fact the only way to determine that. This isn't generally that useful, but might come in handy in certain very specific circumstances like manipulating large images: if you know for sure that an image should be garbage collected, you can wait until it actually is before attempting to load the next image, and therefore make the dreaded OutOfMemoryError less likely.
Second, PhantomReferences avoid a fundamental problem with finalization: finalize() methods can "resurrect" objects by creating new strong references to them. So what, you say? Well, the problem is that an object which overrides finalize() must now be determined to be garbage in at least two separate garbage collection cycles in order to be collected. When the first cycle determines that it is garbage, it becomes eligible for finalization. Because of the (slim, but unfortunately real) possibility that the object was "resurrected" during finalization, the garbage collector has to run again before the object can actually be removed. And because finalization might not have happened in a timely fashion, an arbitrary number of garbage collection cycles might have happened while the object was waiting for finalization. This can mean serious delays in actually cleaning up garbage objects, and is why you can get OutOfMemoryErrors even when most of the heap is garbage.
另请阅读:The Mysterious Phantom Reference
Consider the following code.
public class Foo { private String bar; public Foo(String bar) { this.bar = bar; } public String foo() { return bar; } }So lets say after the object has been completely dereferenced by the application I want to some how call foo(). Here is some code that I expected to work that would do this with one niggle.
// initialize ReferenceQueue<Foo> queue = new ReferenceQueue<Foo>(); ArrayList< PhantomReference<Foo>> list=new ArrayList<PhantomReference<Foo>>(); for ( int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { Foo o = new Foo( Integer.toOctalString( i)); list.add(new PhantomReference<Foo>(o, queue)); } // make sure the garbage collector does it’s magic System.gc(); // lets see what we’ve got Reference<? extends Foo> referenceFromQueue; for ( PhantomReference<Foo> reference : list) System.out.println(reference.isEnqueued()); while ( (referenceFromQueue = queue.poll()) != null) { System.out.println(referenceFromQueue.get()); referenceFromQueue.clear(); }PhantomReference takes an instance of Foo and a ReferenceQueue. Since no handles are kept to Foo, it should immediately be dead. Next, tell the VM to collect as there isn’t enough in heap for it to trigger a collection naturally. The first thing I’m going to ask the PhantomReference is; have you been enqueued. In this case the answer will be true. Next I ask the queue for the reference but as you can see, calling get() always returns null. About the only solution that made sense is to wrap the resources or objects you wanted to interact with in a subclass of PhantomReference.
public class FinalizeStuff<Foo> extends PhantomReference<Foo> { public FinalizeStuff(Foo foo, ReferenceQueue<? super Foo> queue) { super(foo, queue); } public void bar() { System.out.println("foobar is finalizing resources"); } }In this case I’m not going to wrap Foo in the subclass as that would seem to violate the spirit of PhantomReference. Instead I’m going to wrap resources associated with Foo and interact with them. Now I can do this.
// initialize ReferenceQueue<Foo> queue = new ReferenceQueue<Foo>(); ArrayList< FinalizeStuff<Foo>> list = new ArrayList<FinalizeStuff<Foo>>(); ArrayList<Foo> foobar = new ArrayList<Foo>(); for ( int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { Foo o = new Foo( Integer.toOctalString( i)); foobar.add(o); list.add(new FinalizeStuff<Foo>(o, queue)); } // release all references to Foo and make sure the garbage collector does it’s magic foobar = null; System.gc(); // should be enqueued Reference<? extends Foo> referenceFromQueue; for ( PhantomReference<Foo> reference : list) { System.out.println(reference.isEnqueued()); } // now we can call bar to do what ever it is we need done while ( (referenceFromQueue = queue.poll()) != null) { ((FinalizeStuff)referenceFromQueue).bar(); referenceFromQueue.clear(); }
关于java - 幻象引用的实际用途是什么——JAVA?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33476738/
类classAprivatedeffooputs:fooendpublicdefbarputs:barendprivatedefzimputs:zimendprotecteddefdibputs:dibendendA的实例a=A.new测试a.foorescueputs:faila.barrescueputs:faila.zimrescueputs:faila.dibrescueputs:faila.gazrescueputs:fail测试输出failbarfailfailfail.发送测试[:foo,:bar,:zim,:dib,:gaz].each{|m|a.send(m)resc
给定这段代码defcreate@upgrades=User.update_all(["role=?","upgraded"],:id=>params[:upgrade])redirect_toadmin_upgrades_path,:notice=>"Successfullyupgradeduser."end我如何在该操作中实际验证它们是否已保存或未重定向到适当的页面和消息? 最佳答案 在Rails3中,update_all不返回任何有意义的信息,除了已更新的记录数(这可能取决于您的DBMS是否返回该信息)。http://ar.ru
我有一个模型:classItem项目有一个属性“商店”基于存储的值,我希望Item对象对特定方法具有不同的行为。Rails中是否有针对此的通用设计模式?如果方法中没有大的if-else语句,这是如何干净利落地完成的? 最佳答案 通常通过Single-TableInheritance. 关于ruby-on-rails-Rails-子类化模型的设计模式是什么?,我们在StackOverflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.co
我正在使用的第三方API的文档状态:"[O]urAPIonlyacceptspaddedBase64encodedstrings."什么是“填充的Base64编码字符串”以及如何在Ruby中生成它们。下面的代码是我第一次尝试创建转换为Base64的JSON格式数据。xa=Base64.encode64(a.to_json) 最佳答案 他们说的padding其实就是Base64本身的一部分。它是末尾的“=”和“==”。Base64将3个字节的数据包编码为4个编码字符。所以如果你的输入数据有长度n和n%3=1=>"=="末尾用于填充n%
我主要使用Ruby来执行此操作,但到目前为止我的攻击计划如下:使用gemsrdf、rdf-rdfa和rdf-microdata或mida来解析给定任何URI的数据。我认为最好映射到像schema.org这样的统一模式,例如使用这个yaml文件,它试图描述数据词汇表和opengraph到schema.org之间的转换:#SchemaXtoschema.orgconversion#data-vocabularyDV:name:namestreet-address:streetAddressregion:addressRegionlocality:addressLocalityphoto:i
为什么4.1%2返回0.0999999999999996?但是4.2%2==0.2。 最佳答案 参见此处:WhatEveryProgrammerShouldKnowAboutFloating-PointArithmetic实数是无限的。计算机使用的位数有限(今天是32位、64位)。因此计算机进行的浮点运算不能代表所有的实数。0.1是这些数字之一。请注意,这不是与Ruby相关的问题,而是与所有编程语言相关的问题,因为它来自计算机表示实数的方式。 关于ruby-为什么4.1%2使用Ruby返
它不等于主线程的binding,这个toplevel作用域是什么?此作用域与主线程中的binding有何不同?>ruby-e'putsTOPLEVEL_BINDING===binding'false 最佳答案 事实是,TOPLEVEL_BINDING始终引用Binding的预定义全局实例,而Kernel#binding创建的新实例>Binding每次封装当前执行上下文。在顶层,它们都包含相同的绑定(bind),但它们不是同一个对象,您无法使用==或===测试它们的绑定(bind)相等性。putsTOPLEVEL_BINDINGput
我可以得到Infinity和NaNn=9.0/0#=>Infinityn.class#=>Floatm=0/0.0#=>NaNm.class#=>Float但是当我想直接访问Infinity或NaN时:Infinity#=>uninitializedconstantInfinity(NameError)NaN#=>uninitializedconstantNaN(NameError)什么是Infinity和NaN?它们是对象、关键字还是其他东西? 最佳答案 您看到打印为Infinity和NaN的只是Float类的两个特殊实例的字符串
如果您尝试在Ruby中的nil对象上调用方法,则会出现NoMethodError异常并显示消息:"undefinedmethod‘...’fornil:NilClass"然而,有一个tryRails中的方法,如果它被发送到一个nil对象,它只返回nil:require'rubygems'require'active_support/all'nil.try(:nonexisting_method)#noNoMethodErrorexceptionanymore那么try如何在内部工作以防止该异常? 最佳答案 像Ruby中的所有其他对象
关闭。这个问题需要detailsorclarity.它目前不接受答案。想改进这个问题吗?通过editingthispost添加细节并澄清问题.关闭8年前。Improvethisquestion为什么SecureRandom.uuid创建一个唯一的字符串?SecureRandom.uuid#=>"35cb4e30-54e1-49f9-b5ce-4134799eb2c0"SecureRandom.uuid方法创建的字符串从不重复?