我正在研究 Ruby (1.9.3-p0) 中的并发性，并创建了一个非常简单的 I/O 密集型代理任务。首先，我尝试了非阻塞方法:

require 'rack'
require 'rack/fiber_pool'
require 'em-http'
require 'em-synchrony'
require 'em-synchrony/em-http'

proxy = lambda {|*|
  result = EM::Synchrony.sync EventMachine::HttpRequest.new('http://google.com').get
  [200, {}, [result.response]]
}

use Rack::FiberPool, :size => 1000
run proxy

=begin
$ thin -p 3000 -e production -R rack-synchrony.ru start
>> Thin web server (v1.3.1 codename Triple Espresso)

$ ab -c100 -n100 http://localhost:3000/
Concurrency Level:      100
Time taken for tests:   5.602 seconds
HTML transferred:       21900 bytes
Requests per second:    17.85 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       5602.174 [ms] (mean)
=end

嗯，我想我一定做错了什么。对于我们主要等待 I/O 的任务，平均请求时间为 5.6 秒？我尝试了另一个:

require 'sinatra'
require 'sinatra/synchrony'
require 'em-synchrony/em-http'

get '/' do
  EM::HttpRequest.new("http://google.com").get.response
end

=begin
$ ruby sinatra-synchrony.rb -p 3000 -e production
== Sinatra/1.3.1 has taken the stage on 3000 for production with backup from Thin
>> Thin web server (v1.3.1 codename Triple Espresso)

$ ab -c100 -n100 http://localhost:3000/
Concurrency Level:      100
Time taken for tests:   5.476 seconds
HTML transferred:       21900 bytes
Requests per second:    18.26 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       5475.756 [ms] (mean)
=end

嗯，好一点，但不是我所说的成功。最后，我尝试了线程实现:

require 'rack'
require 'excon'

proxy = lambda {|*|
  result = Excon.get('http://google.com')
  [200, {}, [result.body]]
}    
run proxy

=begin
$ thin -p 3000 -e production -R rack-threaded.ru --threaded --no-epoll start
>> Thin web server (v1.3.1 codename Triple Espresso)

$ ab -c100 -n100 http://localhost:3000/
Concurrency Level:      100
Time taken for tests:   2.014 seconds
HTML transferred:       21900 bytes
Requests per second:    49.65 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       2014.005 [ms] (mean)
=end

这真的非常非常令人惊讶。我在这里错过了什么吗？为什么新兴市场在这里表现如此糟糕？我需要做一些调整吗？我尝试了各种组合(Unicorn、几种 Rainbows 配置等)，但它们都无法与简单的、旧的 I/O 阻塞线程相提并论。

非常欢迎提出想法、评论和 - 显然 - 更好实现的建议。

最佳答案

看看您的“每个请求的时间”如何恰好等于总的“测试时间”？这是一个报告算术工件，因为您的请求计数 (-n) 等于您的并发级别 (-c)。平均时间是总时间*并发/请求数。所以报告的意思是什么时候 -n == -c 将是最长请求的时间。您应该通过几个因素以 -n > -c 进行 ab 运行以获得合理的措施。

您似乎使用的是旧版本的 ab，因为默认情况下相对较新的版本会报告更详细的结果。当-n == -c 时，直接针对 google 运行我显示类似的总时间 == 平均时间，并在 -n > -c 时得到更合理的数字。您真的想查看请求/秒，即所有并发请求的平均值，以及最终的服务级别分割，以便更好地理解。

$ ab -c50 -n50 http://google.com/
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 655654 $>
Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/

Benchmarking google.com (be patient).....done


Server Software:        gws
Server Hostname:        google.com
Server Port:            80

Document Path:          /
Document Length:        219 bytes

Concurrency Level:      50
Time taken for tests:   0.023 seconds           <<== note same as below
Complete requests:      50
Failed requests:        0
Write errors:           0
Non-2xx responses:      50
Total transferred:      27000 bytes
HTML transferred:       10950 bytes
Requests per second:    2220.05 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       22.522 [ms] (mean)      <<== note same as above
Time per request:       0.450 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate:          1170.73 [Kbytes/sec] received

Connection Times (ms)
              min  mean[+/-sd] median   max
Connect:        1    2   0.6      3       3
Processing:     8    9   2.1      9      19
Waiting:        8    9   2.1      9      19
Total:         11   12   2.1     11      22
WARNING: The median and mean for the initial connection time are not within a normal deviation
        These results are probably not that reliable.

Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
  50%     11
  66%     12
  75%     12
  80%     12
  90%     12
  95%     12
  98%     22
  99%     22
 100%     22 (longest request)        <<== note same as total and mean above


$ ab -c50 -n500 http://google.com/
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 655654 $>
Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/

Benchmarking google.com (be patient)
Completed 100 requests
Completed 200 requests
Completed 300 requests
Completed 400 requests
Completed 500 requests
Finished 500 requests


Server Software:        gws
Server Hostname:        google.com
Server Port:            80

Document Path:          /
Document Length:        219 bytes

Concurrency Level:      50
Time taken for tests:   0.110 seconds
Complete requests:      500
Failed requests:        0
Write errors:           0
Non-2xx responses:      500
Total transferred:      270000 bytes
HTML transferred:       109500 bytes
Requests per second:    4554.31 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       10.979 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:       0.220 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate:          2401.69 [Kbytes/sec] received

Connection Times (ms)
              min  mean[+/-sd] median   max
Connect:        1    1   0.7      1       3
Processing:     8    9   0.7      9      13
Waiting:        8    9   0.7      9      13
Total:          9   10   1.3     10      16

Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
  50%     10
  66%     11
  75%     11
  80%     12
  90%     12
  95%     13
  98%     14
  99%     15
 100%     16 (longest request)

关于Ruby 并发 : non-blocking I/O vs threads，我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9248420/