所以我对 JVM 内部发生的字节码验证有点困惑。根据Deitel 和Deitel 的书,Java 程序经历了五个阶段(编辑、编译、加载、验证和执行)(第 1 章)。字节码 validator 在“验证”阶段验证字节码。书中没有提到字节码 validator 是类加载器的一部分。
但是根据 docs of oracle ,类加载器执行加载、链接和初始化的任务,在链接过程中它必须验证字节码。
现在,是Deitel和Deitel谈论的字节码验证,以及字节码验证 this oracle document 说说,同样的过程?
或者字节码验证会发生两次,一次在链接过程中,另一次由字节码 validator 进行?
描述了 Dietel 和 Dietel 书中提到的 Java 程序阶段的图片。(我从 nobalG 的以下答案之一中借用了这张图片 :))
最佳答案
您可以通过 Oracle docs 中详细解释的这张图来理解字节码验证。
你会发现字节码验证只发生一次而不是两次
The illustration shows the flow of data and control from Java language source code through the Java compiler, to the class loader and bytecode verifier and hence on to the Java virtual machine, which contains the interpreter and runtime system. The important issue is that the Java class loader and the bytecode verifier make no assumptions about the primary source of the bytecode stream--the code may have come from the local system, or it may have travelled halfway around the planet. The bytecode verifier acts as a sort of gatekeeper: it ensures that code passed to the Java interpreter is in a fit state to be executed and can run without fear of breaking the Java interpreter. Imported code is not allowed to execute by any means until after it has passed the verifier's tests. Once the verifier is done, a number of important properties are known:
- There are no operand stack overflows or underflows
- The types of the parameters of all bytecode instructions are known to always be correct
- Object field accesses are known to be legal--private, public, or protected
While all this checking appears excruciatingly detailed, by the time the bytecode verifier has done its work, the Java interpreter can proceed, knowing that the code will run securely. Knowing these properties makes the Java interpreter much faster, because it doesn't have to check anything. There are no operand type checks and no stack overflow checks. The interpreter can thus function at full speed without compromising reliability.
编辑:-
来自 Oracle 文档 Section 5.3.2 :
When the loadClass method of the class loader L is invoked with the name N of a class or interface C to be loaded, L must perform one of the following two operations in order to load C:
- The class loader L can create an array of bytes representing C as the bytes of a ClassFile structure (§4.1); it then must invoke the method defineClass of class ClassLoader. Invoking defineClass causes the Java Virtual Machine to derive a class or interface denoted by N using L from the array of bytes using the algorithm found in §5.3.5.
- The class loader L can delegate the loading of C to some other class loader L'. This is accomplished by passing the argument N directly or indirectly to an invocation of a method on L' (typically the loadClass method). The result of the invocation is C.
正如 Holger 正确评论的那样,试图在 example 的帮助下进行更多解释:
static int factorial(int n)
{
int res;
for (res = 1; n > 0; n--) res = res * n;
return res;
}
对应的字节码是
method static int factorial(int), 2 registers, 2 stack slots
0: iconst_1 // push the integer constant 1
1: istore_1 // store it in register 1 (the res variable)
2: iload_0 // push register 0 (the n parameter)
3: ifle 14 // if negative or null, go to PC 14
6: iload_1 // push register 1 (res)
7: iload_0 // push register 0 (n)
8: imul // multiply the two integers at top of stack
9: istore_1 // pop result and store it in register 1
10: iinc 0, -1 // decrement register 0 (n) by 1
11: goto 2 // go to PC 2
14: iload_1 // load register 1 (res)
15: ireturn // return its value to caller
请注意,JVM 中的大部分指令都是类型化的。
现在您应该注意,除非代码至少满足以下条件,否则无法保证 JVM 的正常运行:
字节码验证的目的是一劳永逸地检查这些条件,通过在加载时对字节码进行静态分析。通过验证的字节码可以更快地执行。
还要注意字节码验证的目的是将上面列出的验证从运行时转移到加载时。
以上解释摘自Java bytecode verification: algorithms and formalizations
关于java - 字节码的验证会发生两次吗?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25541778/
给定这段代码defcreate@upgrades=User.update_all(["role=?","upgraded"],:id=>params[:upgrade])redirect_toadmin_upgrades_path,:notice=>"Successfullyupgradeduser."end我如何在该操作中实际验证它们是否已保存或未重定向到适当的页面和消息? 最佳答案 在Rails3中,update_all不返回任何有意义的信息,除了已更新的记录数(这可能取决于您的DBMS是否返回该信息)。http://ar.ru
我想安装一个带有一些身份验证的私有(private)Rubygem服务器。我希望能够使用公共(public)Ubuntu服务器托管内部gem。我读到了http://docs.rubygems.org/read/chapter/18.但是那个没有身份验证-如我所见。然后我读到了https://github.com/cwninja/geminabox.但是当我使用基本身份验证(他们在他们的Wiki中有)时,它会提示从我的服务器获取源。所以。如何制作带有身份验证的私有(private)Rubygem服务器?这是不可能的吗?谢谢。编辑:Geminabox问题。我尝试“捆绑”以安装新的gem..
我希望我的UserPrice模型的属性在它们为空或不验证数值时默认为0。这些属性是tax_rate、shipping_cost和price。classCreateUserPrices8,:scale=>2t.decimal:tax_rate,:precision=>8,:scale=>2t.decimal:shipping_cost,:precision=>8,:scale=>2endendend起初,我将所有3列的:default=>0放在表格中,但我不想要这样,因为它已经填充了字段,我想使用占位符。这是我的UserPrice模型:classUserPrice回答before_val
我有一个表单,其中有很多字段取自数组(而不是模型或对象)。我如何验证这些字段的存在?solve_problem_pathdo|f|%>... 最佳答案 创建一个简单的类来包装请求参数并使用ActiveModel::Validations。#definedsomewhere,atthesimplest:require'ostruct'classSolvetrue#youcouldevencheckthesolutionwithavalidatorvalidatedoerrors.add(:base,"WRONG!!!")unlesss
我真的很习惯使用Ruby编写以下代码:my_hash={}my_hash['test']=1Java中对应的数据结构是什么? 最佳答案 HashMapmap=newHashMap();map.put("test",1);我假设? 关于java-等价于Java中的RubyHash,我们在StackOverflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22737685/
我有一些非常大的模型,我必须将它们迁移到最新版本的Rails。这些模型有相当多的验证(User有大约50个验证)。是否可以将所有这些验证移动到另一个文件中?说app/models/validations/user_validations.rb。如果可以,有人可以提供示例吗? 最佳答案 您可以为此使用关注点:#app/models/validations/user_validations.rbrequire'active_support/concern'moduleUserValidationsextendActiveSupport:
当我的预订模型通过rake任务在状态机上转换时,我试图找出如何跳过对ActiveRecord对象的特定实例的验证。我想在reservation.close时跳过所有验证!叫做。希望调用reservation.close!(:validate=>false)之类的东西。仅供引用,我们正在使用https://github.com/pluginaweek/state_machine用于状态机。这是我的预订模型的示例。classReservation["requested","negotiating","approved"])}state_machine:initial=>'requested
我有一个服务模型/表及其注册表。在表单中,我几乎拥有服务的所有字段,但我想在验证服务对象之前自动设置其中一些值。示例:--服务Controller#创建Action:defcreate@service=Service.new@service_form=ServiceFormObject.new(@service)@service_form.validate(params[:service_form_object])and@service_form.saverespond_with(@service_form,location:admin_services_path)end在验证@ser
这里有一个很好的答案解释了如何在Ruby中下载文件而不将其加载到内存中:https://stackoverflow.com/a/29743394/4852737require'open-uri'download=open('http://example.com/image.png')IO.copy_stream(download,'~/image.png')我如何验证下载文件的IO.copy_stream调用是否真的成功——这意味着下载的文件与我打算下载的文件完全相同,而不是下载一半的损坏文件?documentation说IO.copy_stream返回它复制的字节数,但是当我还没有下
我正在尝试使用boilerpipe来自JRuby。我看过guide从JRuby调用Java,并成功地将它与另一个Java包一起使用,但无法弄清楚为什么同样的东西不能用于boilerpipe。我正在尝试基本上从JRuby中执行与此Java等效的操作:URLurl=newURL("http://www.example.com/some-location/index.html");Stringtext=ArticleExtractor.INSTANCE.getText(url);在JRuby中试过这个:require'java'url=java.net.URL.new("http://www